This one is a doozy, and is founded on two variables that need to actually happen for this to be valid:
According to the latest This Week in Hitman https://hitman.com/news/this-week-in-hitman-24-6-2016# , the Summer Bonus Episode is free for you only if you own The Full Experience or the Upgrade Pack. According to Steam, The Full experience includes episodes 1-7, and Upgrade Pack includes episodes 2-7. Locations for all other episodes are listed, except for one, which appears to be Summer Bonus Episode. This is something that a became apparent to a lot of people around E3.There are a couple of matters to consider, however.
Prior to launch, we heard from IO's representatives that there would be no DLC, and that the Season Pass phenomenon was something IO had no desire or intention to get into (I'm sure we'll find the appropriate Hannes Seifert interviews if need be). And apparently I did not purchase "locations" as maps were coined during pre-launch marketing phase. I puchased Episodes, which they are rightly called in Steam where I personally bought them. But they are called Episode 2: Sapienza, for example.
It does turn out that I did not purchase the location Sapienza, I only bought the story-relevant mission that takes place in Sapienza. A more accurate description would have been Episode 2: World of Tomorrow, since I cannot play all the content that takes place in Sapienza (as of Summer Episode). I can, however, play World of Tomorrow and the other modes and live content in that mission.
As the season is stated to conclude with "Thailand and the USA before concluding in Japan later in 2016", it definitely seems The Summer Bonus Episode is just Episode 4. I'm not even going to go into the fact that it might be disappointing not to get an entirely new location as the fourth episode. But how is this Bonus episode effectively not either "DLC" (disregarding that Steam etc have to have episodes named as DLC) or the Full Experience a Season Pass? I will elaborate.
Summer Bonus Episode's missions are not related to the story going on in Hitman "Season 1". Yet this is an episode you have to buy separately unless you have bought the full game, either as Full Experience or Intro + Upgrade. If you have not done this, you have to separately buy these extra missions located in altered Sapienza and Marrakech locations, even if you have bought the episodes that already contain these two locations.
I was on board with calling the maps/levels as locations, but if I need to buy them again, I didn't buy the locations, at best I bought them as they were in one point in time. It's the missions we buy, not the locations.
Effectively, I cannot deny that the model looks exactly like a DLC or a Season Pass scenario.
- If you bought the full game, you would get the game proper, episodes 1-3 and 5-7 plus the Bonus DLC episode 4,
versus
- buying the normal game (episode 1), and would need to buy the rest of the game episodically (2,3,5,6,7), and additionally the bonus episode 4 which is not part of the core story experience.
If the Summer bonus episode is cheaper than rest of the episodes, the issue is not a major one from a financial perspective, or quite arguably not very significant even with the standard episode price. Personally from where I am from, an episode costs roughly the same as a pizza.
The matter is one of marketing, communication, customer relations, transparency, keeping to your word, principle, truth, or whatever degree of severity you want to achieve. Taking a step back, this looks exactly like either having one DLC episode or a Season Pass model. You buy the whole game, you get the whole game, extra episode included. If you don't, you pay for the non-story missions in the modified levels as well.
I didn't agree when earlier in the year there was calling for Season Passes etc when people did the math that buying the full game is slightly cheaper than buying it in parts. It was not a strong argument, nor were there any other good arguments that to me showed that the model was there.
Now that we (presumably) know the content, I won't deny the similarity. If all the episodes were story based, or we got this bonus episode really as a bonus, getting to play it based on if we have those locations bought or not, there would not be an issue.
The signifance of online mode was not expressly stated before launch, for example. It wasn't communicated, but it wasn't denied either: it was left without comment. However, this matter was commented on, and quite clearly.
This is now something that was not supposed to exist.